Why Anger Might Be The Worst Vice

<p>There are many different vices out there. It’s long been a debate amongst priests and philosophers if some are worse than others, or if they are all created equal. Even amongst the Stoics there was some debate—were all sins the same? Was being or doing wrong a matter of degree, or was it black and white?</p><p>It’s one of those things that vexes philosophers but is obvious to normal people. Of course some vices are worse than others. Of course there is a grey area! Welcome to life, genius. </p><p><a href='https://dailystoic.com/seneca/?utm_source=convertkit&amp;utm_medium=convertkit&amp;utm_campaign=worst-vice'>Seneca eventually concurred</a>. As he writes in <a href='https://geni.us/7Bd1NR'><em>Of Anger</em></a>, anger must rank fairly high on the list of vices because it has so few redeeming qualities. “It’s a worse sin than luxury,” he says, “since that is enjoyed by personal pleasure, whereas anger takes joy in another’s pain.” Malice and envy are similar, he said, because they are about wanting <em>other people </em>to be unhappy, not just yourself. Anger and envy are about inflicting harm on others, not just on oneself.  </p><p>Point being: It’s better to be a little bit Epicurean (that is, to enjoy some pleasure) than it is to be an asshole. If you’re going to sin or give in to vice, make sure it only ruins <em>your</em> life. Make sure it’s something internal, not something like anger—which inevitably makes itself felt by the people around you. </p><p>To sin, to fall short, is one thing. To punish innocent people? Well, that’s even worse.</p>