Tribes and Textualism

<p>This week the Court handed down five opinions, two of which involved questions related to Indian Tribes, including one of the term's major cases, <em>Haaland v. Brackeen</em>. The decisions are heavy on textual analysis, showing that Justice Kagan was right when she said "we're all textualists now." Your hosts discuss the opinions, and then Zack tests GianCarlo's knowledge of some lesser-known facts about the Supreme Court's history.</p><br><p>Further reading and listening:</p><br><p><a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary/videos/can-congress-regulate-indian-child-placement-briefly-the-fedsoc-review" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Professor Natelson on the Indian Child Welfare Act</a>.</p><p><a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary/fedsoc-blog/how-clear-is-clear-enough-a-mix-of-textualism-tribal-sovereignty-and-bankruptcy-at-the-supreme-court" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Zack on <em>Lac du Flambeau</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/remedying-criminal-trial-errors-retrial-or-acquittal-in-smith-v-united-states" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Cully Stimson and Paul Larkin on <em>Smith</em></a>.</p><br><p>Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.</p><br><p>Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.</p><br><p>Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a <a href="https://shop.heritage.org/products/scotus-101-mug" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SCOTUS 101 mug</a>.</p><br /><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>