TransUnion and Concrete Harm: One Year Later
TransUnion and Concrete Harm: One Year Later

TransUnion and Concrete Harm: One Year Later

shazia

29 min0 plays0 favorites
Knowledge
Play

Description

<p>The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in <em>TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez </em>resolved fundamental constitutional questions about what a plaintiff must do to establish standing to bring a federal lawsuit. The Court held that to do so, a plaintiff must have suffered a “concrete” injury, and it clarified the standard for determining whether an alleged injury is sufficiently concrete.<br/><br/>In this episode of ILR&apos;s <em>Cause for Action</em> podcast, Jenn Dickey, associate chief counsel at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Litigation Center, and Archis Parasharami, a litigation partner at Mayer Brown, talk about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in <em>TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez </em>and its impact one year later.<em> </em></p>

Creators

ashleighNotes

ashleighNotes

Creator