Roger Ebert Reviewed = DFF #110 (Previously Patrons Only)

<p><span style= "color: rgb(247, 249, 249); font-family: TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.03); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline !important; float: none;"> Often movie critics are out of touch with general audiences, and there's plenty of films that got awful reviews that became cult classics or box office hits. We examine one of the worst offenders.</span></p>