Research Methods: Measuring How People Think - Comparing Causal Maps

<p>Hello and welcome</p> <p>In this episode, I talk about how to #compare #causalmaps of two different people. There is a #formula that you can find in the papers that I list below. In the episode, I explain the logic behind the #measurement. Even though the procedure might look "scary", it is a simple calculation of the distances as you count the #distance between two dots on the #coordinatesystem. If you understand the logic behind the formula, you will quickly understand how the #calculation is performed.  </p> <p>Good luck with your #investigation!</p> <p>Here are the links: </p> <p>1. Our paper with a simplified formula for our specific purposes: </p> <p><a href='https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331489896_Values_congruence_in_multicultural_groups_the_causal_mapping_method'>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331489896_Values_congruence_in_multicultural_groups_the_causal_mapping_method</a></p> <p>Citation: Bogodistov, Y., Botts, M., &amp; Schlatterer, F. (2019). Values congruence in multicultural groups: the causal mapping method. Journal for Multicultural Education, 13(1), 33-50.</p> <p>2. Initial paper with the formula:</p> <p>Markíczy, L., &amp; Goldberg, J. (1995). A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps. Journal of management, 21(2), 305-333.</p> <p> </p> <p>Best</p> <p>Eugene (Yevgen)</p>