PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter
PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter

PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter

Mégane pro

42 min
Success & Inspiration
Play

Description

<p>Despite evidence that deleterious variants in the same genes are implicated across multiple neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, there has been considerable interest in identifying genes that, when mutated, confer risk that is largely specific for <strong>autism spectrum disorder</strong> (ASD). Here, we review the findings and limitations of recent efforts to identify relatively ‘‘autism-specific’’ <strong>genes</strong>, efforts which focus on rare variants of large effect size that are thought to account for the observed phenotypes. We present a divergent interpretation of published evidence; discuss practical and theoretical issues related to studying the relationships between rare, large-effect deleterious variants and <strong>neurodevelopmental phenotypes</strong>; and describe potential future directions of this research. We argue that there is currently insufficient evidence to establish meaningful ASD specificity of any genes based on large-effect rare-variant data. - doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.004 - 2020</p>

Uploader

warren_star

warren_star

PubReading [127] - Insufficient Evidence for ‘‘Autism-Specific’’ Genes - S. Myers, D. Ledbetter - Listen Free | WowFM