OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

<p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to "Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework." So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we've got an update in the Madison Cawthorn situation, and more Kraken sanctions updates!</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>Links: <a href= "https://s3.amazonaws.com/dl.ncsbe.gov/Legal/Wake%20Superior%20Ct%20Order%20on%20Remedial%20Plans.pdf"> remedial election plan ruling</a>, <a href= "https://openargs.com/wp-admin/upload.php?item=2852">Special Masters plan</a>, <a href= "https://openargs.com/wp-content/uploads/Krakenloss.pdf">another kraken loss</a>, <a href= "https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21049106/judge-parker-ruling-82521.pdf"> Judge Parker ruling</a>, <a href= "https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21199215/powell-brief-2022-02-07.pdf"> 6th Circuit appeal</a>, <a href= "https://harvardlawreview.org/2022/02/as-the-legislature-has-prescribed/"> Removing Presidential Elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework - Harvard Law Review</a></p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:block {"ref":1378} /--></p>