OA477: No, Judges Should NOT Be Originalists
OA477: No, Judges Should NOT Be Originalists

OA477: No, Judges Should NOT Be Originalists

StixxyTooWavy

71 min
News
Play

Description

<p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>A recent episode of the <a href= "http://rationallyspeakingpodcast.org/show/episode-254-unfair-laws-why-judges-should-be-originalists-wi.html"> Rationally Speaking Podcast</a> featured Originalist Law professor William Baude arguing for why judges should be originalist. Needless to say, it was not a good case and strawman arguments abounded. Andrew is here to give us part 1 of the deep-dive that will set the record straight on why originalism is still bad.</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>Then we've got Ace Associate Morgan Stringer on for some pop-law! She gives us the breakdown on the lawsuits filed against DeShaun Watson which allege sexual assault.</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>Links: <a href= "https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6298856056242550994"><em> Planned Parenthood v. Casey</em>, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)</a>, <a href= "https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12382043807333770398"> Gamble Decision with Thomas quote</a></p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:block {"ref":1378} /--></p>

Uploader

milo_glow

milo_glow

OA477: No, Judges Should NOT Be Originalists - Listen Free | WowFM