OA324: Trump's 9 Crimes and Misdemeanors

<p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>With impeachment in full swing, today's episode reminds you that <em>we already have more than enough evidence</em> to impeach & remove Donald Trump from office for the <strong>nine distinct crimes</strong> documented by Robert Mueller in Vol. II of <a href= "https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5955379/Redacted-Mueller-Report.pdf"> the Mueller Report</a>.</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>We begin, however, with a pre-show update: the 4th Circuit has just voted to rehear the Maryland emoluments lawsuit <em>en banc</em> on Dec. 12, 2019.</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>After that, it's time to check in on the latest Republican argument: that Democrats need to authorize an impeachment inquiry via a full floor vote in the House of Representatives. Learn why Nancy Pelosi said "Nope!" and why that might be shots fired... at the Supreme Court.</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>Then, it's time for the deep dive into the nine unambiguous, inarguable crimes that we already have proof Donald Trump <strong>has already committed</strong>, thanks to Vol. II of the Mueller Report. You will get a choose-your-own-adventure guide for how to steer your disbelieving Uncle Frank through the Mueller Report and prove that Trump acted with criminally corrupt intent to obstruct justice. "The cover-up is [still] worse than the crime"... isn't it?</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>After all that, it's time for an all-new #T3BE involving a hate crime. Is the Intellectual Dark Web correct that such things are protected by "free speech?" If not, why are they wrong? Play along on social media -- remember to #T3BE with your answer!</p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Upcoming Appearances</span></p> <p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p> <p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p> <p>None! If you’d like to have either of us as a gue