My Interview with Prof. Matthew J. Thomas
My Interview with Prof. Matthew J. Thomas

My Interview with Prof. Matthew J. Thomas

matselisontsohi

62 min0 plays0 favorites
Religion
Play

Description

<p><strong>Bottom Line:</strong> To see what Paul means by “works of the law,” it behooves us to see how the early Church Fathers defined that concept. </p><p><strong>Takeaways</strong></p><ul> <li>In <strong>Romans and Galatians</strong>, Paul says that “works of the law” are not a means of justification. “For we hold that a person is justified by faith apart from works prescribed by the law.” (Rom 3:28). “Yet we know that a person is justified not by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ.” (Gal 2:16) But, theologians through the years have defined “works of the law” in different ways, and this has affected how we believe someone is “saved.” </li> <li>The <strong>“Old Perspective”</strong> defines “works of the law” as any human effort, including <em>good</em> <em>works </em>and <em>pious deeds</em>, that one performs in an attempt to justify oneself. However, because of our inability to perform such works perfectly, they believe that there's nothing anyone can do for their salvation. Thus, in their view, we are “saved” by “faith only.” The scholars we talk about that fall into this perspective include Martin Luther (1483-1546), John Calvin (1509-1564), Rudolf Bultmann (1884-1976), and Douglas Moo (b. 1950). </li> <li>The <strong>“New Perspective”</strong> refers to biblical scholarship that began in the 2nd-half of the 20th-century. According to these scholars, Paul’s “works of the law” refer specifically to Jewish observances—such as circumcision, Sabbath-keeping, and food laws—that are meant to separate Jews from Gentiles. In other words, they function as identity markers that indicate that one is a part of the Jewish nation. They argue that Paul rejects “works of the law” because God’s promises, which are fulfilled by Jesus, are intended for all nations—not simply Jews—and so these identity markers are unnecessary. The scholars that we talk about who represent this view are E.P. Sanders (b. 1937), James Dunn (1939-2020), and N.T. Wright (b. 1948).</li> <li> <strong>Matthew Thomas, i

Creators

candice.flow

candice.flow

Creator