
Limiting the Inevitable Damage
Stephizo la bêtise
Description
<p>Melissa, Kate, and Leah welcome <a href="https://twitter.com/sambhavsankar" target="_blank">Sam Sankar</a> of <a href="https://earthjustice.org/" target="_blank">Earthjustice</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/RossDeuel" target="_blank">Deuel Ross</a> of <a href="https://www.naacpldf.org/" target="_blank">NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund</a> to recap arguments the Supreme Court heard this week in two big cases. <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/21-454" target="_blank"><i>Sackett</i> v. <i>EPA</i></a> is a challenge to the EPA’s authority to regulate wetlands, and <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/21-1086" target="_blank"><i>Merrill</i> v. <i>Milligan</i></a> is a Voting Rights Act case out of Alabama that’s really about whether Congress may ensure the representation and political power of voters of color.</p>