Judas Priest! It's The Triple Crown!

<p><strong>This Week in InfoSec (04:09)</strong></p><p>With content liberated from the “today in infosec” twitter account</p><p>16th September 2008: 20-year-old David Kernell compromised the Yahoo! email account of US vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, then posted her emails to 4chan.</p><p>2 years later he was found guilty and sentenced to a year in prison. At age 30 he died of complications related to MS.</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8655569.stm">Student convicted of hacking Sarah Palin e-mail account</a></p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_email_hack">Sarah Palin email hack</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/todayininfosec/status/1306360597915865097">https://twitter.com/todayininfosec/status/1306360597915865097</a></p><p>9th September 2015: The security of 300 million travel locks was compromised after 3-D printing files were posted online.</p><p>Then again, these travel locks never were particularly secure.</p><p><a href="https://www.wired.com/2015/09/lockpickers-3-d-print-tsa-luggage-keys-leaked-photos/">Lockpickers 3-D Print TSA Master Luggage Keys From Leaked Photos</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/todayininfosec/status/1303847394556219392">https://twitter.com/todayininfosec/status/1303847394556219392</a>  </p><p> </p><p><strong>Tweet of the Week (13:06)</strong></p><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/GrR11OOoufeK47lSYoj9XwPlzjY0B2D710pJsjKPWPFajH0fh6Z3Js45IW0txur6qV7ilJA_5WSeA6hsuzHU_r2nBFi6_SA82tGuC1Ylr8-gHwZUEo8VfjeqUVbRyXt6IBrAQXDi=s0" /><p><a href="https://twitter.com/yolkfolk_com/status/1438580784294735875">https://twitter.com/yolkfolk_com/status/1438580784294735875</a></p><p> </p><p><strong>Sticky Pickle of the Week (18:16)</strong></p><p>Sticky Pickle of the Week is the part of the show where everyone chooses something that they like. It could be a funny story, a book they’ve read, a TV show, movie, record, a podcast, a website, or an app, whatever they like.  It doesn’t have to be security-related necessarily.</p><p>Better no