HOW ZUCK BOUGHT THE 2020 ELECTION

HOW ZUCK BOUGHT THE 2020 ELECTION<br /><br />Previous Article: <br /><a href="https://gorightnews.com/how-zuck-bought-the-2020-election/" rel="noopener">https://gorightnews.com/how-zuck-bought-the-2020-election/</a><br /><a href="https://www.spreaker.com/user/peterboykin/how-zuck-bought-the-2020-election" rel="noopener">https://www.spreaker.com/user/peterboykin/how-zuck-bought-the-2020-election</a><br /><br />A stunning new analysis of tax disclosures reveals how much Mark Zuckerberg funneled $350 million dollars into key swing states during the 2020 election and how that money disproportionately funded turn-out efforts in Biden-friendly districts. We reported on this last month, but new details show just how lopsided it was.<br /><br />First things first: Zuckerberg funneled his Zuck-bucks through a nonprofit company called the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL). <br /><br />According to InfluenceWatch.org, CTCL is:<br />a left-learning election reform advocacy group that pushes for Democrat voting policies. Its founders were part of the now-defunct "New Organizing Institute" which the Washington Post described as “the Democratic Party’s Hogwarts for digital wizardry."<br /><br />Seems like an unbiased arbiter, right... 😒<br /><br />Where the money went: According to the CTCL's 2020 tax filings, it received $350 million in Zuck-bucks. which it distributed to 2,500 election departments in 49 states during the 2020 campaign. Here's how they distributed that money in a few key swing states, between Trump districts and Biden districts:<br /><br />Pennsylvania: $22 million:<br />Trump counties: $1.73 million (7%)<br />Biden counties: $20.8 million (83%)<br /><br />Georgia: $45 million<br />Trump counties: $2.6 million (6%)<br />Biden counties: $42.4 million (94%)<br /><br />Arizona: $5 million<br />Trump counties: $671,000 (13%)<br />Biden counties: $3.9 million (75%)<br /><br />Michigan: $16.8 million<br />Trump counties: Incomplete data<br />Biden counties: $14.6 million (86%) <br /><br />Discrepancies lik