Daily blog (audio): I think I'd failed you if I just took your first answer [About, you know, cancelling]

<p>I think I'd failed you if I just took your first answer [About, you know, cancelling]</p> <p><br></p> <p>We're on a mission to help one million people RISE by 2030 - join the movement at <a href="http://www.myrise.co.uk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.myrise.co.uk</a></p> <p><br></p> <p>I mentioned yesterday about people wanting to cancel.</p> <p>And how, ultimately, the preferred result for both sides is for people to get results they feel are worth the continued investment.</p> <p>No one benefits from the opposite choice.</p> <p>That’s a lose-lose.</p> <p>We’d love to make it a win-win.</p> <p>Member gets results they feel are worth the investment.</p> <p>I get to pay all the bills and feed my kids.</p> <p>Everyone’s happy.</p> <p>So, I genuinely believe I would be failing people if I just left them to cancel.</p> <p>If I just went “Ok” and sent them the cancellation link.</p> <p>Is that what anyone really wants?</p> <p>If it’s a genuine, unavoidable circumstantial reason, that’s cool.</p> <p>But, from my experience, most reasons given that sound unavoidable, probably are if the results justify it.</p> <p>Nearly everyone that gives unavoidable circumstantial reasons for “needing to stop” hasn’t been getting the results they’d have liked.</p> <p>So, I’ll ask questions.</p> <p>Not ‘arguing with you’ type questions.</p> <p>Questions that might help you lead to the answers that serve you better.</p> <p>After all, if we keep asking the same questions, we just get the same answers.</p> <p>Answers that, probably, haven’t led us to where we’d like to go to.</p> <p>It’s because we care and we understand that we won’t just take your first answer.</p> <p>And we do understand.</p> <p>And I’ll cover tomorrow what’s usually happening when people think “he / they doesn’t understand”.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Much love,</p> <p>Jon ‘Chris Tarrant’ Hall</p>