Atheist Corrects Apologist (in a debate) | Part 5 of 8
Atheist Corrects Apologist (in a debate) | Part 5 of 8

Atheist Corrects Apologist (in a debate) | Part 5 of 8

Raeesah Mussá

8 min
Religion
Play

Description

This is a formal debate between myself and Cameron Bertuzzi on whether horrendous suffering disproves God. This is my second rebuttal. Citations: 1. There is a distinction between 100% certainty and certainty simpliciter. Certainty is just a firm conviction that something is the case. 2. J.L. Schellenberg (2007), The Wisdom To Doubt: A Justification Of Religious Skepticism, Cornell University Press, p. 255 3. Elie Wiesel (2006), Night, Hill and Wang, p. 6 4. Peter Van Inwagen (2006), The Problem of Evil, Oxford University Press, p. 30 5. Stephen Maitzen (2019) “Normative Objections to Theism”, A Companion To Atheism And Philosophy, Wiley Blackwell, p. 208 (Kindle) 6. Ibid, in reference to Eleonore Stump 7. David Lewis (2007), “Divine Evil”, Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations On Atheism And The Secular Life, Oxford University Press, p. 231 (Kindle)

Atheist Corrects Apologist (in a debate) | Part 5 of 8 - Listen Free | WowFM