Anti-Abortion Litigation at Warp Speed

<p>Melissa, Kate, and Leah recap the Supreme Court's recent opinions about the Internet and intellectual property. As we predicted, the Internet isn't going to end with a bang-- and not even a whimper. Plus, we give you the "highlights" of the oral arguments in the Texas mifepristone case... which are even wilder (and more terrifying) than we could have imagined.</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/strict-scrutiny-live-at-howard-university-school-of-law-tickets-634262254477" target="_blank">Sign up</a> to see the Strict Scrutiny live show in Washington, DC on June 9th!</li><li>The hosts covered the arguments of the opinions for Gonzales v. Google LLC and Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh in this <a href="https://crooked.com/podcast/not-the-nine-greatest-experts-on-the-internet/" target="_blank">episode</a>.</li><li>In this <a href="https://crooked.com/podcast/pigs-prince-and-proven-innocence/" target="_blank">episode</a>, the hosts discussed the arguments for Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, another one of the opinions discussed.</li><li>This past<a href="https://crooked.com/podcast/busting-unions-and-dodging-opinions/" target="_blank"> episode</a> discusses the arguments for Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, an opinion the hosts talk about this week</li></ul>