A Deep Dive Into Gonzalez v. Google

<p>This episode features four segments that dive into <em>Gonzalez v. Google</em>, a case before the Supreme Court that could have major implications on platform liability for online speech. First, we get a primer on the basics of the case itself; then, three separate perspectives on it. </p><p>Asking the questions is <strong>Ben Lennett</strong>, a tech policy researcher and writer focused on understanding the impact of social media and digital platforms on democracy. He has worked in various research and advocacy roles for the past decade, including serving as the Editor in Chief of Recoding.tech and as policy director for the Open Technology Institute at the New America Foundation.</p><p>Ben’s first interview is with two student editors at the publication <em>Just Security</em>, <strong>Aaron Fisher</strong> and <strong>Justin Cole</strong>, whom <em>Tech Policy Press</em> worked with this week to co-publish a <a href="https://techpolicy.press/mapping-the-key-arguments-in-supreme-court-amicus-briefs-in-gonzalez-v-google/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">review of key arguments in the amicus briefs</a> filed with the Court on the Gonzalez case. Then, we’ll hear three successive interviews, with <strong>Mary McCord</strong>, Executive Director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP) and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center;&nbsp;<strong>Anupam Chander</strong>, a Professor of Law and Technology at Georgetown Law; and <strong>David Brody</strong>, Managing Attorney of the Digital Justice Initiative at the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law.&nbsp;</p>